Home energy decision tools

Know if it pays
before you buy.

Decision-grade spreadsheet models for EV, solar, battery and heat pump investments — comparing real cashflows over time and showing which assumptions actually drive the outcome.

Built for analytical homeowners — the kind of people who want to see the assumptions, not receive a pitch.

Decisions we're modelling first

  • EV vs ICE — total cost over 5–10 years
  • Home vs public charging — what mix breaks even
  • Solar impact — how much it changes EV economics
  • Battery storage — when it's worth it (and when it isn't)
Independent — no affiliate links, no installer leads All assumptions visible and editable Sensitivity shows what actually drives the result
Join the waitlist Launching soon. One email when v1 is ready.

Not "will it pay off" —
under what conditions does it pay off.

Most calculators give you one answer. We show you the three variables that actually determine whether that answer changes. That's a more useful frame for a €30–80k capital decision.

01

Explicit cashflows over time

Nominal annual cashflows for every year of your ownership horizon — fuel, energy, maintenance, financing, residual value. No black-box outputs. Every number is traceable.

02

NPV and break-even, not just a payback year

NPV comparison, cost-per-kilometre, cumulative cost crossover — presented together so you understand the full financial picture, not just when the lines cross.

03

"What must be true" sensitivity

Change one variable — mileage, electricity price, fuel price, residual value — and see how much the conclusion shifts. Surfaces the 2–3 drivers that actually matter for your scenario.

Example output — Irish household · ID.4 vs comparable ICE · 15,000 km/yr · 6 kWp solar
Illustrative
10-year EV total cost (undiscounted)€40,554
10-year ICE total cost (undiscounted)€52,824
NPV advantage (EV vs ICE)−€3,798 in EV's favour
Break-even year (cumulative cost)Year 8
Key sensitivity driverElectricity price (±€0.05/kWh shifts break-even by ~1.5 years)
These figures are illustrative. Your actual numbers depend on your vehicle choice, mileage, tariff, and solar configuration — that's exactly what the model is built to calculate.

Transparent by design. Rigorous by training.

What this is — a capital allocation model for EV vs ICE decisions with charging strategy and solar interaction, built for people who prefer to understand their inputs and challenge their assumptions rather than trust a number from a manufacturer's website.

How it's built — explicit cashflows in nominal €, a small scenario set, and "what must be true" sensitivity so you can see which conditions keep the decision rational — and which ones flip it.

Market presets included — Ireland, UK, Germany, Netherlands and Generic EU quick-start defaults, all user-editable with guidance on where to find your own current rates.

  • Excel model + Google Sheets version — full compatibility, no macros, works exactly as expected
  • Dashboard with charts — cumulative cost curves, break-even callout, sensitivity tornado
  • Clean inputs, cashflows and NPV outputs — every formula visible, every assumption editable
  • Sensitivity engine — surfaces the 2–3 variables that actually drive your outcome
  • Methodology documentation — what's modelled, what's excluded, and why — so you know exactly what you're working with
  • Market presets — quick-start defaults for Ireland, UK and key EU markets

What you won't find in
an OEM calculator.

Independence

No financial incentive in the outcome

No affiliate links. No installer referrals. No manufacturer partnerships. The model's job is to give you an honest answer — whatever that happens to be.

Transparency

Every assumption is visible

Blue cells are inputs. Every formula is open. The methodology doc explains every modelling choice — including the deliberate limitations. No black boxes.

Integration

EV and solar modelled together

Solar changes the EV economics meaningfully. Most tools model them in isolation. We treat EV charging strategy, solar yield, and grid tariff as one interconnected decision.

Honesty

Explicit scope boundaries

The methodology document clearly states what the model doesn't do — no hourly dispatch, no live API data, no automated incentive fetching. Knowing the limits is part of using it well.


Built by energy industry professionals. Used in our own homes.

WattDecide is built by professionals with over 17 years of analytical experience in the renewable energy sector — energy modelling for wind, solar and storage projects at a commercial scale.

We also own EVs, solar panels, battery storage and the full smart-home setup. We built WattDecide because the tools available to homeowners making these decisions were — with few exceptions — either marketing tools dressed up as calculators, or technically sound but impossible to use without a finance background. We wanted something in between: rigorous, transparent, and usable by anyone prepared to engage with the numbers.

17+ yrs in renewable energy analysis EVs + solar + battery homeowners Smart home / Home Assistant No conflicts of interest

One price. No subscription.
Yours to keep.

Support add-on
149

One structured support interaction — a 20-minute model review or a detailed email walkthrough — to help you apply the model to your specific situation. Limited availability.

  • Everything in Standard
  • One email ticket or 20-min video review
  • Your own scenario sense-checked by the analyst who built it
  • Priority response
Get notified at launch

Refunds: if the model isn't a fit, email within 7 days of purchase with your reason. Refunds are at our discretion to prevent abuse of digital downloads.
WattDecide is for decision support and education — not financial advice.


Launching soon

Join the list.
One email when it's ready.

No drip campaigns. No weekly newsletters. One notification when v1 ships — then it's your call.

Join the waitlist

Unsubscribe any time. No affiliate links. No installer leads. Ever.